Thursday, April 30, 2015

4.30 Portfolio for college comp + reflective writing for rhetorical analysis essay

During the first part of class you set up the portfolio for the College Composition assessment of your work.  You set the permissions to "private" and invited both me and collcomp@kean.edu to view.  The template for the portfolio is posted at Sample Portfolio to the right.

This portfolio differs from the portfolio we have been using for class in that:
1. It contains much less of your writing (read the pages in the sample portfolio to see what to post).
2. You will paste your work on the page, rather than attaching it.

I received an invitation from every student present in class, and all the portfolios I checked where formatted correctly.

Reflective writing for analysis essay
We spent the rest of class working on the reflective writing for the rhetorical analysis essay.  We looked at the assignment sheet and I emphasized that this should be an essay.  The list of questions is a set of prompts to help you think about what you will write.  Your essay should have a focus and make a point about what you learned.  We did some group brainstomring (made a list on the board) for topics you might work with for a focus.

For next class:
Come to class prepared to work on your reflective essay for the course - where you review and assess all of your writing for the course.
Due: all writing for the rhetorical analysis unit.  This writing will include the following.

300 points total
Homework/practice for Rhetorical nalysis essay (50 points) List of zinczenko points 3.31 (10 points)
Group document with Z. analysis + organization (post a link to your group, your name shold be on the group document) (10 points)
Homework analysis of Obama 4.2 (10 points)
Group work for Obama analysis + presentation (10 points)
Map of rhetorical moves + plan for essay on Balko 4.13 (10 points)

Process writing for Rhetorical analysis essay (100 point) Map of rhetorical moves in Warner or Orbach 4.16 (25 points)
draft analysis 4.23 (25 points)
plan for revision 4.28 (25 points)

Final essays (150 points) Final rhetorical analysis 4.30 (100)
reflective writing on rhetorical analysis essay 4.30 (50 points)

Tuesday, April 28, 2015

4. 28 workshop and plan to revise for analytic essay

Protocol for the workshop
Tell peer any feedback you would like
Read draft aloud )can make notes as you read)
Peer, talk about each of the points below
After discussion is complete = take a minute to provide written feedback

Post feedback to your peer at your portfolio as 4.28 peer feedback= be sure to put the name of the person you are providing feedback for


Questions to discuss in your peer review: 
Does the draft meet the requirements of the assignment?
·       Does the draft focus on the rhetorical effectiveness of the reading?
·       Does it discuss audience, organization, ethos, pathos, & logos?
·       Does it relate each rhetorical element to the focus?
·       Does it point out what could work better?


To evaluate for the GE rubric consider the following.

Genre expectations;
  • the essay discusses the rhetorical elements in terms of how they work (relationships); the rhetorical elements are audience, purpose, form, ethos, pathos, logos, etc.
  • uses TS/IS language = attributes points from the essay to the author, uses mostly paraphrase, uses quotations when pointing to partiular language, refers to the author using the forms from the summary unit
  • has an introduction which sets up the focus, and a conclusion which pulls the essay's together and draws the discussion to a close

Focus: 

  • sets up a focus on the rhetorical effectiveness of the essay it is analyzing
  • takes a position on the essay's effectiveness
  • discusses rhetorical elements and their relationships

Organization:

  • TS before IS
  • logical order = presents background information before analysis 
  • effectve use of paragraphing (one developed point per paragraph and each point needs to develop the overall focus in a different way)

Development:

  • detailed examples/illustrations from the text under analysis to support claims


Write a plan for revision

After you have finished with your peer review, write a plan for revising your essay.  In your previous plans for revisions, you listed the issues you needed to work on.  For this plan - write a description of the process you will use to work on each issue, point to parts of the reading you will use to develop your essay, discuss why the organization needs to be changed and what changes you will make, etc.  This plan for revision does not need to be a polished essay, but it does need to have some detailed discussion of what you will revise, along with why and how you will revise it.

For next class:

Write:  Post your peer feedback + your plan for revision to your portfolio.  They should be labeled 4.28 Peer feedback, and 4.28 Plan for revision. analysis

In class on Thursday you will create the portolio for the College Composition coordinator.  This is a new portfolio, with a slightly different format fromt he portfolio you created for me.  We will walk through this process, step by step, in class.  

We will also brainstorm and get started on the reflective writing for the analytic essay.  This will be very similar to the writing you have done for all the other units, except that this will be a focused, well developed essay.  You will need to make a series of claims about what is working and what needs more work, and those claims should be supported by a discussion of/illustrations from your writing process and from your essay.  We will work on this in class.

Good work today, and see you on Thursday.

Thursday, April 23, 2015

4.23 Workshop on analytic essays

In class, we talked a little more about audience analysis.  In some cases, you need to do a little research to figure out who the readers for a particular audience might be.  For  example, for the essay by Judith Warner, we looked at the Pew study of the audience for NYT.  The data in this study gave us picture of the identities for the NYT Magazine readers.  With this information, we have a better idea of who Warner was writing to.

You spent the rest of class working on your essays, and talking one-on-one with me about how to complete your essay.  You all look like you are on the right track.  Good work so far!

For next class:
Write: Rough draft for Analytic essay  POST YOUR DRAFT TO YOUR PORTFOLIO.

In class we will workshop your essays, and you will write peer reviews for classmates' essays, and based on the workshop and peer feedback = you will write a plan for revising.

Good work today and see you on Tuesday!

Tuesday, April 21, 2015

4.21 Brainstorming for analytic essay

To get started with this assignment - you needed to choose which essay you were going to analzye => the Warner or the Orbach.  We spent the first part of class talking about how to choose a reading which will allow you to write your best essay.  You identified a number of factors relevant to the essay you would choose for this assignment.

1.  How well you understood the authors ideas and moves.  In order to analyze the effectiveness, you have to understand what the essay does and how it does it.  If one essay was more clear to you, or if you had a stronger logical explanation for how one worked as opposed to the other - that might be a reason for choosing that essay.

2. Audience.  To write this essay you will need to understand the audience's values, beliefs and assumptions.  For eacho of these essays you might want to do a little research to make sure you know where and when the essay was published, and who reads that publication.  Depending on who you are, you might know more about one of those audiences.  Choosing the essay with the audience you are most familiar with (or have the most connection to) is another basis for choosing one essay over the other.

3. Length.  Shorter essays allow you to go deep, and provide less to deal with; longer essays provide more material.  So whehter you choose the short or the long essay depends on which way you want to go in terms of your analysis.

4. Which essay interested you the most?  Always important.

5.  Which essay allows you best to demonstrate what is demanded by the assignment?

After we talked about the assignment sheet, you then did some writing about which essay you would choose and why - and then you reported back to the class on what you wrote.

At that point you divided into groups, by essay, and mapped out the essay you chose to write about.  You used the following prompts to guide your writing.

Brainstorming for analytic essay.
This writing is your analysis of the essay you will write about.  It is a place to explore ideas.  Don't edit ideas out!  Put all your speculations/ideas about what is happening in each section (and why) on the page.

Break the essay into sections.  Sections should be groups of paragraphs directed at meeting a particular rhetorical purpose (setting up the "mood" for the discussion, characterizing the "other side"; establishing definitions, providing background, making a point, summing up what has been said so far + setting up the next section, etc).  We did this for the Obama talk, and for Balko.  This will give you a "map" of the essay's overall flow or the sequence of what it does (how it affects the audience).

Note the use of ethos, pathos, and logos, as well as the use of particular words and phrases to effect those moves.  (We did this in our discussion of Balko - like when we noted his use of the word "we").

Make sure everyone in your group has a link to this work, and that they can edit it.

More brainstorming - deciding what you will say.
Your essay needs to make a statement about the effectiveness of the essay you analyze.  This means you have to say what works (or not) and you must provide evidence for why/how it works (or not).

This brainstorming is the place where make a list of points you might make about your essay, along with the evidence you will use to develop a discussion of how that point works.  This is exactly what we did in class last week in our discussion of Balko.

Specifically, you were given time to:
1. Do a 10 minute freewrite about how your essay is effective and why.  For this writing - just get ideas out there, don't worry about proving them - go from your feelings for now.

2.  Make a list of the ideas/points you raised about how/whether your essay works.

For next class:
Write: 
1) Post the brainstorming we did in class to your portfolio;  This brainstorming should include: the writing about which essay you chose + why, a copy of the group document you created to analyze the moves in your essay, the freewriting, the list.  Paste all of this into a single document, label it 4.21brainstorming analysis, and attach it to your portfolio.

2) post a "draft so far" to your portfolio.

In class we will workshop the drafts-so-far and make a plans for finishing these essays.





Thursday, April 16, 2015

4.16 Planning an essay for the Rhetorical Analysis assignment

Overview of moves in Balko
audience + purpose: rallying readers of cato.org (group that already agrees with him) to the cause of defeating health care legislation

presents the other side’s arugment +> we need to have voverernment regulation of food

his side: no one between you and your waistline (this is not really what he argues = his real argument is directed toward health care, not regulating food choices)
use of the term “pep rally”


2. facts - about what the other side has done/tried to do
this information is presented more neutrally
ethos = I am objective

3. states his position in detail
on the surface this is logical, presents himself as the logical analyst

4.point:  too much responsiility by government for our own health weight
logos based paragraph , again, “objective report on government 

5. we’re becoming less responsible
examples in terms of “you” and “me” - pathos=> this is making us behave this way

6. logic -if 4+5 then we will be OK with “socialistic” healthcare => sets us up to go along with laws to restrict other consumer choices (but none of the examples have anything to do with healthcare)

7.  All these initiat ives are about taking responsibility away from the individual

8 his soultion = no “public” restrictions on what we ead (? gov has not proposed this
use of words “ownership /privacy socialism = pathos move

9 sum up his argument = about healthcare!


10 return to use of “we” = pathos move =>enlists audience in his position

Plan for a rhetorical analysis essay on Balko (to meet the requirements of this unit's assignment)

Each numbered point may take one or more paragraphs.  The numbers are to indicate the overall organization.

1. Introduction 
name the essay + author
present the They Say=> an overview of the the author's focus /purpose
identify the audience
state your assessement of the essay's rhetorical effectiveness + indication of points to support this assessment (your thesis)

2. In-depth development of features of the audience = their values, expectations and how they connect to the author's purpose

(Body of the essay = your argument for why Balko's essay is successful - or not- with his audience)

3. He argues an issue which is important to his audience 

4. he uses pathos successfully (couples moves which connect to readers' values wth his logos, uses words which his readers will react to : individual, socialism, pep rally, ownership etc

5. uses logos to give the audience a logical frame for the connections between increased gov regulation, personal responsiblity, and funding for healthcare

6. ethos
cites facts/demonstrates awareness of current issues to establish himself as an authority
uses "we" to establish himself as an insider

7.  critical evaluation = points about what does not work so well
this argument may not be so effective with outsiders because of the distance between of the examples in the argument (about market control) and the point he is arguing (about healthcare)

8.  conclusion = sum up what  works, what doesn't work + why

Here is the list of criteria we made for assessing how well essays for the assignment were doing:
Genre expectations;

  • the essay discusses the rhetorical elements in terms of how they work (relationships); the rhetorical elements are audience, purpose, form, ethos, pathos, logos, etc.
  • uses TS/IS language = attributes points from the essay to the author, uses mostly paraphrase, uses quotations when pointing to partiular language, refers to the author using the forms from the summary unit
  • has an introduction which sets up the focus, and a conclusion which pulls the essay's together and draws the discussion to a close

Focus: 

  • sets up a focus on the rhetorical effectiveness of the essay it is analyzing
  • takes a position on the essay's effectiveness
  • discusses rhetorical elements and their relationships

Organization:

  • TS before IS
  • logical order = presents background information before analysis 
  • effectve use of paragraphing (one developed point per paragraph and each point needs to develop the overall focus in a different way)

Development:

  • detailed examples/illustrations from the text under analysis to support claims
For next class:
Read: choose either Warner or Orbach for the focus of your rhetorical analysis
Write: Map of your essay's argument (as we did for Obama + Balko)



Tuesday, April 14, 2015

4.14.15 Presentation + analysis if Balko

Obama presentations: You gave your panel presentations on Obama - and they were great!   We gave feedback in class.  Overall observations:  the personal stories were what stood out as most convincing; Obama's order => connecting to audience (identifying with the group); presenting a story-based version of the problem and identifying it as a SHARED problem, followed by a logos/information centered presentation of the problem's solution, followed by a ethos-pathos based conclusion= a good strategy for convincing an audience who may not necessarily connect to your values/position at the outset.

Analysis of Balko.  The second half of class was devoted to analyzing Balko's essay, which takes on a very different kind of a rhetorical task.  His essay is directed toward an audience who already shares his belief in minimizing government regulation, and his task is to rally that audience around an argument to establish the truth of their position.

We analyzed the first two paragraphs of Balko's essay together.  We noted the content of the paragraph, the purpose that content served in his overall argumet, and what language or "moves" he made to accomplish that purpose.

After analyzing the first two paragraphs, we looked at the assignment sheet and noted the list of features you needed to discuss in your essay.  The assignment sheet requires you to develop a rhetorical analysis which


-  characterizes the readings audience (who will read/respond to it);
-  describes the reading
s purpose (what it was written to accomplish);
-  characterizes how the reading
s overall form works to achieve its purpose;
-  characterizes how the author uses ethos, pathos, and logos to achieve the reading
s purpose;
-  evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of the reading (how well it achieves its purpose);
-  and suggests how the reading might be improved 

During the rest of class, you worked on analyzing all 10 paragraphs of Balko's essay using the approach we used together for the first two paragraphs, and doing some writing based on that analysis to answer the questions required by the essay.

For next class:
Write: 1) map out the order for an rhetorical analysis of Balko which meets the criteria for the assignmet sheet; 2) using your invention writing for the 6 points listed above, map out a rough draft for a rhetorical analysis of Balko

In our next class - we will look at sample rhetorical analysis essays and evaluate them, and you write a discussion of what you would need to do to "finish" the rough draft you mapped out for homework.



Rhetrorical analysis presentations

1. Yun, Esther, Erika, Steven

2. Selena, Diego, Samir, Tajanik 

3. Rana, Aguida, Isaiah, Haley 

4.  Jasmin, Natalie, Ashton, Darian, Bryan

Thursday, April 9, 2015

4.9 Work on rhetorical analysis presentations

You spent class today working on your rhetorical analysis of Obama's speech, and developing your presentation to your target group where you will make moves which parallel the rhetoric of Obama's talk.

We started class by reviewing the rhetorical structure of Obama's talk (check out the previous blog post).  You then added the following to the google.doc where you posted this analysis:


  • a detailed description of the group you will talk to.  For example, not just "high school students" => name the High School, and write down some of the features of the students.  Are the serious students or more interested in socializing, having a good time?  What kinds of careers do they expect?  What kinds of families do they come from?  What do they think is "cool" and what is not?  This description will help you plan the parts of your script where you appeal to your audience's values.
  • a detailed description of your purpose.  What are you going to persuade this audience of?  Obama had particular programs  she was promoting.  What is your program?  How does it connect to your audience's values
  • a description of your group.  Who will each of you be?  What is your role in the presentation.


You then spent the remainder of class working on the script for your presentation.  MAKE SURE TO PARALLEL THE MOVES FROM OBAMA's TALK.  That is the point of this assignment.


For next class:
Write: Complete your script, come to class prepared to "perform" your presentation.

Tuesday, April 7, 2015

4.7 Rhetorical Analysis Presentations

Today we reviewed the assignment sheet for the rhetorical analysis assignment, and then we spent the rest of class working on a working on a detailed analysis of Obama's speech to the NAACP in terms of the content,  the rhetorical moves she made, and the function of each move - paragraph by paragraph, and move by move.

Overview of the moves + functions of the moves in Obama's speech to the NAACP

1. opening
thanks  (par1-6) thanks individuals (members of organization=> =connect to her target audience, first)

building connections to the audience (par 7-10) discusses history of organization + its audience; pay attention to her use of "we" and "you" => "we" emphasizes connection, "you" acknowledges the work + accomplishments of the group

setting up focus in general (11-14)  charges the group with "more to do" to achieve equality + good lives => for our children (introduces focus on children)

setting up focus in terms of health + obesity + kids(15-19)  problem with obsesity for kids = important the way they feel = health risks

re-state focus in terms of organization's interests (20-21) African American community + the work of the NAACP

2. body of argument
i. first point of argument (25-42)= the culture of activity and eating is different for kids today than it was for us

her generation/ AA culture in terms of activity (25-30) use of "we" => connects to group
her generation/ culture of eating (31-36) use of "we"
what it is like for kids (then AA kids) in terms of activity and eating (37-42)

ii. second point (43 -47 ) these changes are resulting in health issues, connects to NAACP's agenda

iii. Obama's agenda => (48-74) what she proposes to do about these problems (her agenda)

Let's move program
(48-50) defines objectives
(51) identifies partners/stakeholders (interested parties)
(53-74) sets up the 4 components of the program (orients the audience to what she will say) and then discusses them one by one :  the general pattern she uses to discuss each component is to state what the component does, give an example, describe the legislation associated with the component's objectives, identify partners, and transition to the next component.

For the fourth component, she gave much more background material (proof) that this last component was necessary (so if you have a point that your audience won't understand or connect to => give background)

(75-86) sets forward ways to change at the individual level, she moves from general statements to specific examples, then a transition .  covers let's cook, breast feeding + WIC  (3 ways individuals can act + government helps)

87 need to look at our own habits
88 set examples
89-91 community examples
92 transition to conclusion

iv  Conclusion
94-104 connects back to NAACp history (you can do this because you have done this kind of work many times before => a series of examples)
105  Final appeal for Obama's agenda

Map of Obama's moves
1. Opening:  connects to audience through thanking group for their attention to her, using we, acknowledging group's accomplishments, setting up focus in general way, connecting general focus to the group's agenda.  Comparison of "us" (generation/group seeking to address the problem) and "them" (generation with the problem) as transition to set up her agenda for solving the problem.

2. Body:  sets up her agenda in a general way, then in a specific way.
i. Let's Move.
defines plan, breaks into components (sets up overall argument => tells how many points)
in the description of individual components, she describes each component in terms of what it does, how it connects to her actions (government), how to and who can support her actions; transition to next component.  She gives history (additional persuasive facts/context) for any point that might be difficult for the audience to understand.

ii. individual and community actions.

3. Conclusion
connects back to group's agenda, identity + history
restates her request for action.

Assignment for next class.
For the last part of class, you chose an audience and a purpose for an argument you would make to the class in the form of a presentation.  Your argument's purpose + audience should be chosen so that they "fit" with the form of Obama's argument.

Groups + their (so far) audience + argument:
1. Yun, Esther, Erika, Steven

2. Selena, Diego, Samir, Tajanik 

3. Rana, Aguida, Isaiah, Haley

4.  Jasmin, Natalie, Ashton, Darian, Bryan

For next class:  Each group will write a script for a speech, addressed to their chosen audience, to persuade them of their "agenda", using the form or moves in the order set forward in Michelle Obama's talk to the NAACP.

For sample presentations, see Rhetorical Analysis Presentations from last semester



During the first part of class, you will be able to "polish"/go over the script.  During the second part of class, you will "perform" your scripts.  All group members should have a role for the performance (we will talk about this in class).

Thursday, April 2, 2015

4.2 Planning for the rhetorical analysis assignment

In class today you worked in groups to analyze and plan an essay David Zinczenko's "Don't Blame the Eater."

You started by working in groups to confer on the characterization of the rhetorical moves you wrote for homework.  After you had a list of what moves Z. made, paragraph by paragraph, you answered 3 questions.

1. What moves does Zinczenko make and where (characterize the pattern for his use of ethos, pathos, and logos)?

2.  Which moves are effective and why?

3. Is Zinczenko's essay effective for its audience and purpose?


After talking trhough your analyses of Z's essay and your assessment of its effectiveness- we noted that the way to "prove" that the essay was effective (or not) was to describe how he used ethos, pathos, and logos - and to state why and how each of those moves was effective.  If the essay makes effective use of ethos, pathos, and logos for its audience & purpose => then it is effective.


Assignment sheet for the Rhetorical Analysis project.  We then looked at the rhetorical analysis assignment and notices that this assignment asks writers to do exactly the kind of evaluation /analysis that we have just done.  Because you cannot write the essay until after you have spent considerable time analyzing the essay, and because there are so many demands/criteria stated on the assignment sheet - we suggested the following process of writing this assignment.

1. read the essay
2. write a paragraph by paragraph analysis of how the essay uses the rhetorical elements (see list from last class)
3. do some drafty writing (answer the 3 questions above in some detail) to develop your ideas about how the essay uses the rhetorical elements
4. create a map for your essay (list the order of the points you will make in the intro, body, and conclusion of your essay)
5. draft your essay
6. workshop/make a plan for revising/revise your essay
7. revise again if necessary
8.  turn in final draft

You spent the last part of class working in groups to create a "map" for an essay on Zinczenko.  This map should list the points you will cover, in the order you will cover them.  We talked in some detail about the points you could make in the introduction.  And we suggested that the organization of the body might be in terms of a paragraph by pargraphy or section by section discussion of the essay's use of ethos, pathos, and logos; or it could be a point by point discussion of how (and where) the author uses the 3 rhetorical elements.  As we noted, there were lots of choices for how to organize an essay that would cover all of the requirements listed on the assignment sheet => and that is why it is important to map out a plan before starting to write.  You might not use the exact plan you come up with, but your plan will be a point of reference - so you can make sure you are writing to the assignment.

Good work today!

For next class:
Read: Michelle Obama's essay, p. 417.
Write: make a list (briefly and in some cases by section) of the order of Obama's rhetorical moves

I will be reviewing the persuasive writing portfolios over the weekened.  Make sure all documents, portfolios etc are set so that "anyone with a link" can access the materials.  Material which is not accessible to me will be marked as not turned in.

"maps" for rhetorical analysis of Zinczenko

Group 1
Planning :

● summarize essay

● introduction

● who is the audience (urban professionals and middle age men)

● purpose

● give statement about if essay is effective

● where he uses pathos ( give example )

● where he uses ethos ( give example )

● where he uses logos ( give example )


Group 2
  • Based on David Zinczenko text “Don’t Blame the Eater” he discusses his belief how its the fast food industry fault for the numerous health hazards and obesity. He argues that nobody takes personal responsibility for theses accounts. His audience relates to a more adult audience for these are facts and factors adults will take into consideration rather than children.

  • Throughout the passage of his text he mentions his own personal experience and discusses his own struggles. Such as growing up dealing with childhood obesity and he does his best to connect to the reader. as well state facts how fast food industry can be harmful makes his readers be alarmed.
  • David Zinczenko says- page- 392 “ By age 15, i had packed 212 pounds of torpid teenage tallow on my once lanky 5-foot 10 frame.
  • David Zinczenko says-page-393  “ prepares aren’t covered under food and drug Administration labeling laws. Some fast-food purveyors will provide calorie information on request, but even that can be hard to understand.   
  • In summation David Zinczenko allows his readers to understand their struggle with the food industry with in own struggle. As well gives insight how the food industry is to blame for health hazards gives examples and facts on how and why.

Rhetorical analysis

Group 1
1 pathos : he is being sarcastic , joking around, trying to get the readers attention in a

way that is not serious and drastic.

2 pathos : he is giving his personal story.

3 logos : he is talking about logistics of diabetes and type 2 diabetes.

4 logos : he is talking about the cost of diabetes.

5 ethos : he is being knowledgeable about the location and marketing of fast food and

healthy food and where their stores are located.

6 ethos : he is giving information about false advertising and how some places don't

show calorie count .

7 ethos : he is giving information about food and how much calories they contain.

8 pathos : he is making fast food restaurants look bad and trying to get the audience on

his side.

9 ethos : he is giving information and warning his audience from fast food restaurant

and how they don't put labels.

*It is borderline effective because the targeted audience has mixed views.

*He uses pathos in the first paragraph, by being sarcastic to grab his audiences

attention.

*His ethos and logos moves were the most effective because he gives more information

and is a lot more appealing to his audience.

Group 2
1.Ethos-establishes credibility with reader using Porshe argument
2.Ethos-tells the reader he understands because he was one of them
3.Pathos-gives background on his story
4.Pathos-more info on his back story
5.Logos-gives facts, stamtements
6.Logos-more facts
7.Logos/Ethos-gives logical reasoning and also tries to convince reader       
8.Log0s-Gives logical reasoning behind advertisement of fast food
9.Logos-Facts on calorie intake
10.Ethos-tries to get you to sympathize with people making lawsuits
11.Ethos-makes reader think more about the issue being written

Is this essay effective for its audience and purpose?
Yes, because it can help parents, as example, to realize what it going on in fast-food business. Yes, because he uses vertain examples to get the reader to sympathize and think about the issue. He tries to persuade the reader to maybe think about helping promote better health.

What moves does he make? Where?
He utilizes both pathos and ethos to help convince reader and bring emotion out of reader. He also uses logos to help elaborate what he says with ethos/pathos. For example, paragraph 9 he gives examples about the calorie intake and warnings as to convince the reader.

Which moves do you think are most effective?

The moves that are most effective, in our opinion, is ethos. The use of ethos helps convince the reader and get them, in the least, interested.